Good mentoring fails when the evidence lives in ten places: a chart image in chat, a trade number in a spreadsheet, a journal note nobody sees, and a dashboard only the student can open. Tradeways brings the mentor into the actual trading record with selected, read-only access and permissions that keep private work private.
Share one account first. Keep the rest of the workspace private.
Third entry sized 2× plan. Same pattern as last Tuesday — flag this in tomorrow's pre-market.
A coach can only correct what they can see. Chat threads pass around fragments — a chart, a number, a sentence — without the sizing, the sequence, the prior commitment, or the journal note that explains the trade. The shared record carries all of it through.
Each relationship has its own scope. The funded challenge can be visible while the personal account stays hidden, and inside the shared account you decide which journals, dashboards, and strategies travel with it.
Mentors open a single page and move from a student roster to a shared account to a specific trade and the feedback that belongs to it. Students see the same surface from their side. There is no parallel app to keep in sync.
Sizing went from 1 to 2 on this entry — that's outside the strategy. Look at the journal: you wrote 'one contract, no exceptions' at 09:12.
The same record powers both sides. Mentors don't ask for screenshots; students don't reconstruct context.
Mentors can send feedback with account context, trade or journal references, and image attachments. Students can return to the thread without reconstructing what the comment was about.
Mentors get a roster and account overviews. Students get relationship management, permissions, and feedback in the same place. Both sides work from the same record instead of parallel tools.
The system works for a paid coach, a trusted trading friend, a review partner, or a small accountability loop. The core promise is the same: feedback tied to the evidence.
A correction loses its weight when it floats free of the evidence. Tradeways pins every comment to the account, the trade, the journal entry, or the screenshot it refers to — so the thread is still useful the next time the student opens it.
Sizing went from 1 to 2 on this entry — that's outside the strategy. Look at the journal: you wrote 'one contract, no exceptions' at 09:12.
You're right. I felt 'sure' after the second winner. That's the trigger, not the setup.
Add it to the rule: after two winners, size stays. Tomorrow's pre-market check.
The feature is intentionally broader than formal coaching. It supports any relationship where one trader wants another person to review decisions with enough evidence to be useful.
Share the active account with a coach, include the dashboards and journal scopes that matter, and keep the review focused on the exact trades behind the lesson.
Screenshots can show a chart. They rarely show sizing, sequence, journal context, prior commitments, dashboard trend, or the trades the student did not mention. Shared record review fixes that.
The mentor can move from account overview to trade evidence, journal context, dashboards, strategies, and feedback without asking the student to re-send the same material.
A review partner can point to the specific behavior that needs to change: oversized third trade, missing journal entry, ignored setup rule, or repeated loss pattern.
The student chooses the relationship, accounts, and permissions. Sharing can be useful without becoming an all-or-nothing exposure of the full trading workspace.
One-to-one coaching, accountability partners, funded-account reviews, and small private groups all start from the same primitive: permissioned access to evidence.
Add one relationship, share one account, and turn the review into a conversation that finally points at the evidence. The rest of the workspace stays exactly where it is.
Share one account first. Add more — or revoke — whenever you want.